A former minister of aviation Chief Femi Fani-Kayode who has been battling to quash the money laundering case filed against him by the nation’s anti-graft body, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) will finally know his fate on June 18, 2015.
Fani-Kayode who was the spokesperson for the Jonathan Presidential Campaign had recently during an interview with journalists dismissed allegations that he was perfecting plans to flee the country. He declared, “ I have nothing to fear, I will remain in the trenches”.
Justice Rita Ofile-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court, Lagos, today fixed June 18 to rule on the case.
The judge also granted Fani-Kayode’s prayer to substitute one of his sureties, Wale Ajisebutu with one Ogbor Elliot, following Ajisebutu’s request to withdraw his suretiship for the accused.
At the resumed hearing on Monday, counsel to Fani-Kayode led by Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN) urged the court to dismiss the two- count charge against the accused as well as discharge and acquit him.
Adedipe told the court that the defense relied and adopted its final written address filed April 7, and its reply on point of law to the prosecution’s written address, dated April 27.
He argued that the prosecution’s submission in the case were misplaced and misguided, accusing the EFCC of trying to show to the world that they have a “big fish” but “there’s no fish here.”
According to Fani-Kayode’s lawyers, the prosecution has failed woefully to prove that the accused received the alleged N1 million, adding that no witness was brought by the EFCC to substantiate its claim.
He said: “It is now an accepted principle of law that the prosecution in all criminal cases must prove its case.
“Nobody gave evidence that he gave or saw the accused collecting money (N1 millon). The only evidence was that of prosecution witness Supo Agbaje, whom the prosecution had declared wanted.
“In his statement, the witness said he deposited N1 million in the accussed’s account but never said he saw the accused collecting money.
“What happened after the receipt of money is not the case but receiving the money. The accused never confessed to receiving money from anybody and there is no such evidence before the court.”
